“Even though not every book will be right for every reader, the ability to read, speak, think and express ourselves freely are core American values,” said Barbara Jones, director of the ALA’s Office for Intellectual Freedom. “Protecting one of our most fundamental rights – the freedom to read – means respecting each other’s differences and the right of all people to choose for themselves what they and their families read.”
As much as I have slagged on the Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer (and I have done my share), I will also stand up and defend these same books as suitable for anyone who wants to read them. I may not enjoy the stories or the writing, but that is my choice. This is the first year Twilight has made the list, and the objections apparently encompass “Sexually Explicit, Religious Viewpoint, Unsuited to Age Group.” Since I haven’t read them in their entirety (bits and pieces, enough to convince me I had better things to do with my time), I don’t know what the religious objection is (Meyer is Mormon, but I don’t think there is any Mormon doctrine explicitly mentioned). Unsuited to age? What exactly are tweens (the target age group, ostensibly) supposed to be reading? The eleven and twelve-year-olds reading these books are on the cusp of the angst-ridden teen years, reading about other teens (even silly ones, vampire and werewolf teens) is exactly what they need to be reading.
J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series is the most-challenged of the decade from 2000-2009, for “occult/Satanism.” I must have missed the Satanism when I read them, I’ll make another pass through and try to find it. And “anti-family” themes. Anti-family? Aunt Petunia and Uncle Vernon are strange and unusual, but they’re not unlike members of my own family. C’mon, who doesn’t have a relative (or three) they’d like to keep hidden in the family closet? Raise your hand… anybody? I loved the Weasley’s, I wish they’d adopt me. You couldn’t ask for a more loving, concerned, involved, tight-knit family.
Anyway, the top ten list (taken from the ALA Web site) for 2009 is:
1. “TTYL; TTFN; L8R, G8R (series), by Lauren Myracle
Reasons: Nudity, Sexually Explicit, Offensive Language, Unsuited to Age Group, Drugs
2. “And Tango Makes Three” by Peter Parnell and Justin Richardson
Reasons: Homosexuality
3. “The Perks of Being A Wallflower,” by Stephen Chbosky
Reasons: Homosexuality, Sexually Explicit, Anti-Family, Offensive Language, Religious Viewpoint, Unsuited to Age Group, Drugs, Suicide
4. “To Kill A Mockingbird,” by Harper Lee
Reasons: Racism, Offensive Language, Unsuited to Age Group
5. Twilight (series) by Stephenie Meyer
Reasons: Sexually Explicit, Religious Viewpoint, Unsuited to Age Group
6. “Catcher in the Rye,” by J.D. Salinger
Reasons: Sexually Explicit, Offensive Language, Unsuited to Age Group
7. “My Sister’s Keeper,” by Jodi Picoult
Reasons: Sexism, Homosexuality, Sexually Explicit, Offensive Language, Religious Viewpoint, Unsuited to Age Group, Drugs, Suicide, Violence
8. “The Earth, My Butt, and Other Big, Round Things,” by Carolyn Mackler
Reasons: Sexually Explicit, Offensive Language, Unsuited to Age Group
9. “The Color Purple,” Alice Walker
Reasons: Sexually Explicit, Offensive Language, Unsuited to Age Group
10. “The Chocolate War,” by Robert Cormier
Reasons: Nudity, Sexually Explicit, Offensive Language, Unsuited to Age Group
If that’s not enough, check out the list for the Top 100 Most Banned/Challenged books for 2000 – 2009.